We do not negotiate with terrorists.

This statement has become the official policy of every European State.

Before I start, I would like to explain what I mean by "European State".
In my previous post, it was revealed through the use of an old dictionary that a State is a government which resides over a territory. When I refer to "European States", I mean any State which was founded by Europeans for Europeans.

Now back to the program.

The official policy of North Korea is "Songun", or military first.
Enhancing the State's military strength is the main priority of the government.
By placing the military above social well being, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea adopted a policy which resulted in a four year famine starting in 1994.

It really jogs the noggin

On a side note, did you know there are massive ore deposits under North Korea?
That should put the US-NK relations in perspective.
archive source

A change in policy of the magnitude necessary to prevent the four year famine would have weakened the citizen's perception of the strength of the State, so the DPRK high command had no other choice than to continue with it's military first policy in order to save face.
"Face" is a combination of reputability, honor, and fidelity. Sociopolitical maneuvers which are meant to maintain or attack "face" are seen in every aspect of Asian culture, as well as in the exchanges between major Geo-political players.

A similar sequence of events has been playing out in European States since the conclusion of WW2.

First, the European States adopted a policy of open borders.

Then the European States adopted a policy of, "We do not negotiate with terrorists."

In my previous post about influencing political nexuses I came to the conclusion that there is no political way of bringing about any sort of meaningful change, because population centers are wholly controlled by incestuous conspiracies of fraud and corruption.
The result is that truly intelligent people of the European Founding Nations are completely disenfranchised from society as a whole.
The most recent shooters publicized by State sponsored media outlets were motivated by their disenfranchisement and the obvious signs of ethnic replacement.

Just like North Korea's Songun, there is no way for European States to radically change the policies which have threatened the Founding Nations without affecting their face. The State cannot simply put an end to immigration and conduct mass deportations, because that would show weakness to racially motivated terrorists while simultaneously reinforce the belief that the State is guilty of the UN's definition of genocide.

UN definition of genocide:

a. Killing members of the group;
b. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
c. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
d. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

e. Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

archive source

By allowing mass immigration and not deporting millions of illegals, the State has deliberately created a job market which favors "under the table" employees, and part-time or temp workers. Couple poor employment prospects with ever increasing housing and healthcare costs, and you have an environment which is not conducive to raising above replacement rate quantities of children within the Founding Nation.
The birthrates are further suppressed in State schools by mentors who encourage women of the Founding Nations to practice procrastination with their fertility in order to build careers instead of families.

It's a very slow genocide which matches part "c" and "d" of the UN's definition.

This pattern proves the numbers of disenfranchised won't decline; in fact, they will continue to grow as the number of long-term stable jobs continues to fall. Besides the loss of stable income, attacks by State imported foreigners on the Founding Nations will polarize even those who refuse to take a stand.

personalized radicalization centers

archive source

personalized radicalization centers

archive source

The State will respond with more violence, continuing the traditions long since established...

at the Nation Mall...

and Ruby Ridge...

and Waco...

and Paris

All while expanding it's regime through the use of rigorous censorship and expansive weapon prohibitions as I've outlined in my previous post.
What you end up with is another feedback loop in addition to the federal reserve debt loop.

More immigration will lead to more disenfranchisement, which will lead to more violence.

The good news is that everything I've outlined is nothing new.

The really good news is it's downright ancient.

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

The Declaration of Independence, 1776

The hilarious news is that the European States are gleefully achieving a defined goal of Brenton Tarrant.

To agitate the political enemies of my people into action, to cause them to overextend their own hand and experience the eventual and inevitable backlash as a result.

Tarrant, Brenton. "The Great Replacement: Towards a New Society We March Ever Forwards." pp. 6. source

If the European States "don't negotiate with terrorists", why would they do exactly what a terrorist wants?
You would be right if you're thinking that whatever reactionary legislation passed is an inevitability, not the result of the action itself.

The really bad news is that the formerly European States have been preparing for this for over 20 years.
HIPAA, PATRIOT, NDAA, and numerous other laws are intended to be used against enemies of the State.
As I've said before, the State's most dangerous enemy is it's Founding Nation when the State no longer represents it's Founding Nation.

Just like Vietnam before it, Afghanistan and Iraq were testing grounds for this inevitability.

Why do you think the US Government is pushing for 5G?

Because it's a lot cheaper and easier running one cable for power than two for power and data to several million cameras across the European territories.

And it's downright hilarious that it might be sparked with less than the 2019 Chicago death toll.

Black on black violence.

archive source

Chicago is a war zone and the State decides that a few lone gunmen are more important because they hold unacceptable beliefs?
That's downright criminal!

Radical, man.

I leave you to think about my thoughts with an excerpt of literature written by my Nation's most influential men.

they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

The Declaration of Independence, 1776